As the year draws to a close, Nigeria is slipping into a familiar end-of-year mood: equal parts reflection and unease about what the next chapter may bring. From motor parks and markets to offices and social media timelines, one subject dominates conversation; the new tax regime scheduled to take effect in January 2026.
For many Nigerians, the reforms have become a symbol of two competing emotions. There is fear, shaped by a long history in which taxation has often meant coercion, harassment and hardship. And there is hope, born of exhaustion after a bruising economic year and a quiet longing that conditions might finally begin to improve.
From January 1, 2026, the federal government will roll out four major laws: the Nigeria Tax Act, the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act, and the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, all signed into law in 2025. Together, they represent one of the most far-reaching tax overhauls Nigeria has attempted in decades.
On paper, the reforms are ambitious. They promise more than 50 targeted exemptions and reliefs, the elimination of multiple taxation, the banning of touting and illegal roadblocks used in the name of revenue collection, and a more coordinated tax system across federal, state and local governments.
ALSO: Unity Bank Losses, Delayed Accounts and Heavy Liabilities Threaten Providus Bank Deal
Away from policy briefs and official assurances, however, a different story is circulating.
“From January, they will tax everything,” has become a common refrain repeated by traders, artisans and even salaried workers. The new tax regime has taken on a life of its own, driven less by the substance of the laws and more by rumours, half-truths and outright propaganda.
Public anxiety peaked recently after claims emerged that the gazetted versions of the tax laws differed from what the National Assembly passed. Although Taiwo Oyedele, chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, dismissed the claims and lawmakers ordered a regazetting exercise, the episode deepened public suspicion and reinforced the sense that something might be amiss.
Economists say the confusion exposes a deeper challenge.
“In the absence of clear, consistent public communication, speculation fills the vacuum,” a Lagos-based tax consultant said. “People end up reacting to policies that do not even exist, while ignoring what the reform actually contains.”
The anxiety is especially pronounced in the informal sector, where millions already feel squeezed by overlapping levies, aggressive collections and little evidence of social protection in return.
Government’s case: relief, not punishment
Government officials insist those fears are misplaced. Speaking after a meeting with President Bola Tinubu in Lagos, Oyedele described the reforms as pro-people and growth-oriented.
“These reforms are designed to provide relief to the Nigerian people,” he said.
According to him, the biggest winners will be ordinary workers. “The bottom 98 per cent of workers will see either no PAYE tax or lower taxes,” Oyedele said.
Small businesses, he added, stand to gain even more. “About 97 per cent of them will be exempt from corporate income tax, VAT and withholding tax,” while large companies are also expected to pay less under the revised framework.
The objective, he argued, is not to extract more revenue from a struggling population but to rebuild the system in a way that supports growth, inclusion and shared prosperity.
“The whole idea is to promote economic growth and shared prosperity,” Oyedele said. “We are excited about the progress and looking forward to January 1, 2026.”
In his view, sustainable government revenue will come from economic expansion, not higher tax rates. “Over time, you get revenue from growth. People pay not because rates have gone up, but because the base has expanded,” he said.
Beyond revenue, the reforms are also intended to address Nigeria’s weak tax culture. “If people who were not paying before start paying—and they are not low-income earners—you get more revenue and greater fairness in society,” Oyedele added.
Why skepticism runs deep
Despite these assurances, distrust remains entrenched. For decades, taxation in Nigeria has been associated with forceful collections, multiple levies and limited service delivery. For many citizens, taxes have felt more like punishment than civic responsibility.
Simon Samson, chief economist at ARKK Economics and Data Limited, says much of the current anxiety is rooted in misinformation.
“People are naturally anxious about new policies, and lack of information makes it worse,” he said. “There is a widespread assumption that the new tax law means higher taxes, and that is not accurate.”
What will change, Samson explained, is the breadth of the tax net. “More people—especially in the informal sector—will be brought into the system. That does not mean those already paying taxes will face higher rates.”
On the issue of multiple taxation, Samson pointed to the Joint Revenue Board Act as a possible turning point. “It is meant to coordinate taxes across all levels of government and reduce overlap, harassment and inefficiency,” he said, adding that if properly implemented, the reforms should not worsen the cost of living.
He also noted that new mechanisms such as tax ombudsmen and tribunals could offer taxpayers protection—something largely absent in the past.
Between hardship and stability
Beyond the noise, there are tentative signs of economic stabilisation. Pressure in the foreign exchange market has eased, access to forex has improved for some businesses, and analysts are projecting further moderation in inflation alongside renewed investor interest.
For entrepreneurs and young professionals, these shifts matter. Economic recovery is not an abstract concept; it is tied to jobs, incomes and the ability to plan a future.
If executed well, Samson believes the tax reforms could support long-term stability rather than deepen hardship. Reducing dependence on oil revenue would shield Nigeria from global price shocks, while higher thresholds and exemptions for micro, small and medium enterprises could encourage growth and investment.
“Harmonising tax laws can improve investor and consumer confidence,” he said. “That confidence is critical for growth.”
Rebuilding public trust, he argued, will require a break from past practices. Transparent administration, reduced corruption and visible links between taxes collected and public projects delivered will be essential.
“When people can see what their taxes are being used for, compliance becomes easier,” Samson said. “Taxation should be about citizenship, not coercion.”
A fragile hope for the year ahead
As the countdown to the new year begins, expectations are modest rather than grand. Nigerians are hoping for clarity instead of confusion, stability instead of constant shocks, and breathing room after years of strain.
Once again, the country stands at a familiar crossroads—caught between fear shaped by past disappointments and hope fuelled by the promise of reform. Whether the new tax regime becomes a turning point or another missed opportunity will depend not just on the laws themselves, but on how transparently, fairly and humanely they are implemented.
